Archive for September, 2007

The Unbonding concludes

I am back home, slightly woozy but none the worse for wear. The Great Unbonding was a failure, in the sense that Olga and I failed to unbond, but it was a success in the sense that we got her settled into her apartment, and had some fun doing it. It was an exhausting week. We drove something over 1000 miles during the week, 400 of that on a quick overnight visit to see my father and stepmother at their home on the far side of Los Angeles. Sadly, I had never managed to see him since he moved there a couple of years ago when he remarried. He is clearly supremely happy, however, and it was very satisfying to see him doing well.

That visit also gave Olga an opportunity to discover that she has relatives on the West Coast. Our last name is fairly obscure: there are maybe about 150 people in the United States that share it. She was convinced that the west was family free, but my father called in the clan, and she started meeting some of my cousins. One is a hospital administrator in San Diego, another is with the LAPD, and a third is a doctor in Seattle. She didn’t meet all of them, but my father’s efforts still bore fruit. Olga immediately recognized and appreciated the quirky, even socially inept, sense of humor that the family shares, and started to feel that there would be people who were willing to be called upon if the need arose. In a new environment, that knowledge is comforting.

Still, most of our time was spent getting her situated in her apartment just off the UC-Santa Barbara campus. She is sharing it with another graduate student, and I was gratified to find that it was what I like to think of as a starter apartment. Two bedrooms, two baths, small, with a little age on it — anybody who ever lived off campus in either undergraduate or graduate school would immediately recognize it. I became a little misty when I first saw it. How many of these places had I lived in! I resolved to come home, sell the house and move into a starter apartment myself. Sadly, my wife will likely veto the plan when she returns from England, but I am fond of it.

It is a good situation, though, for Olga. She is a couple of miles from campus, and only a mile or so from a shopping center with all the necessities (a bakery, a Borders and an organic growers’ farmers’ market on Sunday afternoon) and the more mundane (grocery store, drug store, etc.) She will not have a car, instead relying on her bicycle and the bus system, so close proximity is a genuine plus. Just as important, at least for a Deacon Dad, an Antiochian parish, St. Athanasius, is also within pedaling distance. Olga attended on Sunday, and reported that the choir was incredibly good, the people were friendly, and that one of the priests was from South Carolina and spent some time talking southern to her.

All of this is in a lovely place. Santa Barbara is nestled in a slender strip of land, with the Pacific Ocean on one side, and high, jagged mountains on the other. It is immensely beautiful, and the ocean breezes keep the place cool. I was deeply impressed.

Eventually, though, the time came to leave, and it was a little difficult. As a family, we are uniformly introverted, and it is hard to make transitions very suddenly. Nonetheless, I took my leave, although two hours later, when I found myself stopped dead in traffic on the freeway in LA, gazing at the Wilshire Boulevard exit sign, I had to ask myself why, exactly, had I left. I understand people living in Los Angeles ask themselves this question on a fairly regular basis.

In the event, I’m back home now. Marina and I are holding down the fort, along with Max the Wonder Dog, as we await my wife’s return. I have not adjusted fully. In court today, my mood was horrendous. I snapped at the judge, snarled at opposing counsel, and worst of all, was openly critical of the brand new, just opened, courthouse in which I found myself. Believe me — things can only go up from here.

The Great Un-bonding begins

Some of you may remember that earlier this summer Olga and I concocted a brilliant scheme, designed to get her moved to California to start grad school, while at the same time making it as excruciating as possible so that everyone would be happy with the immense geographical distance between us. As originally conceived, it involved driving cross country, but eventually it became clear that was too ambitious even for us, so we substituted another, almost equally irrational plan, in its place. Under this scheme, she and I would fly to San Francisco, loiter there briefly, and then drive some 300 odd miles to her new home in Santa Barbara. We would then drive an indeterminate distance to visit my father somewhere east of Los Angeles, then return to Santa Barbara to tie up loose ends before I fly out of Los Angeles Saturday morning. Friday night, of course, I will go clubbing with celebrities.

This plan was settled upon, and finally yesterday we began to implement it. After a Deacon’s service Sunday morning, my wife and Marina deposited the two of us at the Atlanta airport, and the great unbonding had begun. At this point, on Monday evening, I can offer some initial observations.

First, Sunday of Labor Day weekend is a great day to fly. The lines at security in Atlanta were negligible, and on both of our flights Olga and I had a three seat row to ourselves. I say both flights, since in my obsessive drive to be as cheap as possible, I booked flights through Minneapolis, thence to San Francisco. That was the cheapest route available. Neither Olga nor I had ever been in Minnesota before, so we will be able to add a state to our Facebook maps. I’ll confess, though, that it felt odd to be there when the city had suffered such a disaster just a few weeks ago.

Second, it is great to be back in San Francisco. Honestly, this is my favorite US city. Just descending over the Bay last night as we came in to land put a smile on my face. There are a lot of reasons to like San Francisco. St. John Maximovitich is here for starters, along with a vibrant Orthodox community. The city itself is just full of energy, and within the space of a few blocks you can often feel that you have traveled from one country to another, possibly passing through a third along the way. The variety of people is amazing. An illustration: last night Olga and I went to dinner after we got in. It was nine or so local time, which meant it was midnight to us, so we didn’t want to go far. We wandered down the street from the hotel about a block to a place called Gullivers. It was a fairly impressive re-creation of an English tavern. The women servers wore period dresses, and the men wore knee breeches and tri-corner hats. For all of that detail, the only omission seemed to be that there were no Englishmen. The host was Chinese, our waitress was Russian, the bartender was Salvadoran and the pianist was Japanese. It was both amusing and oddly edifying.

This morning, we rode BART into town and bounced around for a while. It was great fun, but then we decided we needed to get serious. We had to go to Palo Alto to Ikea, and obtain a bed for Olga. I wanted her to bring her bed from home, but it wouldn’t fit in the overhead bin on the plane. Ikea was suggested, by a person who will remain nameless. It was a sad mistake.

Many people are unaware of this, but Ikea is very much an agent of the anti-Christ, or at least we agreed on that once we escaped from the store. Maybe it was because every incoming student at Stanford was there, but the place was completely mobbed. We slowly wound our way through the place, wrestled Olga’s bed onto a cart, and finally escaped. It is hard to describe precisely what an unpleasant experience it was. Never. Again.

Even with that terrible experience, though, we have not yet unbonded, probably because we both agree that the Horsemen of the Apocalypse will be riding horses provided by Ikea. In any event, that ordeal behind us, tomorrow morning we leave, Swedish bed in tow, for the 300 mile trip to Santa Barbara. This time tomorrow, I’ll be assembling the bed that the evil Ikeans sold us. We will see how things stand then vis a vis un-bonding.

Fourteenth Sunday After Pentecost: Matthew 22:1-14

“The Kingdom of Heaven is like a marriage feast.” This is a common enough image in the Scriptures. We find it in several places, and hear it on more than one occasion during the year. While we normally think of a wedding as a joyous occasion, however, when we see it in the Gospels it is almost always accompanied by sobering lessons. This is the dilemma we see in today’s gospel. Our Saviour describes for us a joyful setting, and then injects elements of doubt, uncertainty and even fear. Jesus’ parable has some challenging aspects to it, important meanings that we need to understand, and to think about.

The image of the wedding feast is an important one for the Church. Generally speaking, it refers to the bond, to the union of Christ and his Church. As members of the Church, we are guests at the feast. By virtue of our baptism and chrismation, we have become members of the family of God or, as St. John the Evangelist says, we have become the children of God. We are family members come to celebrate a great event. In a sense, Liturgy every Sunday is a feast, as we come to the Lord’s table and partake of what He has prepared for us. In a broader sense, the wedding feast continues for all time, and in heaven itself. There, we will, as the prayer of Thanksgiving after communion says, “attain to the everlasting rest, where the voice of those who feast is unceasing, and the gladness of those who behold the goodness of Thy countenance is unending”. Whether here or in heaven, the feast is an occasion of joy and celebration, a mark of the enormous love which God has for all of His children.

Yet we also know that simply being within the Church does not guarantee our salvation. We do not belong to the “once saved, always saved” camp. St. Gregory the Great reminds us that both good and bad are mixed together in the Church, and we see the truth of that in our own times. The Church has men and women of amazing sanctity, and it has others – lay people, clergy, even occasional bishops – who harbor within themselves soul destroying passions.

Now, of course, none of us is immune from the passions; from greed or lust or anger. Most of us are between the two extremes of good and evil. If we are serious about our faith, we are striving to work out our salvation. We consciously struggle with the sins and temptations in our life. We fervently seek to root the passions out of our soul, through prayer, through fasting, through confession, and through partaking of communion. As our life continues, we gradually shed more and more of these blemishes of our spirit, as we draw ever closer to God. It is that cleansing, that conscious effort to follow the Lord, that creates our wedding garment, the one that we wear to the feast.

You see, when Jesus tells us that the man was confronted for not wearing a wedding garment, it is not clothing He is talking about. As long as we dress modestly and with an eye toward honoring the sanctity of the Church, what we wear is unimportant. This is no beauty pageant!

But our spiritual garment – our wedding garment – is of the utmost importance. It is woven of the virtues we have cultivated, and of the love we have expressed. The Church Fathers tell us that our wedding garment is woven on a divine loom, from the twin strands of love of God and love of neighbor. It is what tells the world that we are indeed Orthodox Christians. Not in a showy fashion, where we proudly speak of how much we fast or pray or read the Fathers. Nor is our garment apparent if we speak critically of other Orthodox Christians, and attack them for some presumed failure in praxis or what we view as faulty tradition. This is self-justification, it is puffed up pride. St. Paul spoke to his own spiritual children, saying this:

“Do we begin again to commend ourselves? Or do we need, as some others, epistles of commendation to you or letters of commendation from you? You are our epistle written in our hearts, known and read by all men…written not on tablets of stone, but on tablets of flesh, that is, of the heart.”

Or listen to Jesus, speaking at the Sermon on the Mount:

“You are the salt of the earth; but if the salt lost its taste, how shall its saltiness be restored? It is no longer good for anything except to be thrown out and trodden under foot by men.”

Do you see? Coldness and pride in our hearts separates us from God. We must have love for each other, love for those who visit us in our homes and in our parish, love for those who we meet in the byways of life. If we secretly cherish pride or resentment, we do not show the love of Christ. Instead, we show the disdain of the devil. That is the garment of the Pharisee, and there is no love in it.

In the parable, we are told that the man not wearing such a garment, utterly unable to defend himself, is cast into the outer darkness. What is the outer darkness? It is separation from God. In the parable, where the king represents God himself, we see the man bound hand and foot and consigned to the darkness. It is a spiritual reality that if we nurture our resentment or pride we may find ourselves cast into the eternal darkness, separated from the light and the warmth, from the joy of the feast. The soul is bound, for it is no longer able to help itself, to show charity or love. And while that is a judgment of God, it is one we have authored ourselves. We choose to love or to hate. To blame or to forgive. To grasp or to give. We have been admitted into the kingdom. If, like the man in today’s parable, we find that we have been ejected from it, we have no one to blame but ourselves.

That is why we are told that many are called, but few are chosen. The truth is that we are all called. It is not a question of whether God wants us. He wants all of us to be saved. Rather, it is a question of whether or not we want God. Those who are chosen are those who wish to be chosen. While we cannot save ourselves, we must, in the first instance, make up our mind to pursue God. Our life, indeed, our entire being, must ceaselessly focus on the task we have begun, in cooperation with God Himself, of weaving our wedding garment. We cannot let ourselves be unprepared for the great wedding feast that we will all attend.




178450 pages viewed, 144 today
70658 visits, 100 today
FireStats icon Powered by FireStats